Re: Newer old hardware
- From: Henrik Carlqvist <Henrik.Carlqvist@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 08:07:05 +0200
GangGreene <GangGreene@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Bobbie Sellers wrote:
I don't see any reason to stick with 32 bit
versions unless you have a tool that won't work with
the 64 bit Linux.
That would be wine
Wine is one of the reasons to make sure that you choose a 64 bit
distribution with multilib support to also be able to run 32 bit binary
applications.
regards Henrik
--
The address in the header is only to prevent spam. My real address is:
hc123(at)poolhem.se Examples of addresses which go to spammers:
root@localhost postmaster@localhost
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Newer old hardware
- From: notbob
- Re: Newer old hardware
- From: GangGreene
- Re: Newer old hardware
- From: Aragorn
- Re: Newer old hardware
- References:
- Newer old hardware
- From: notbob
- Re: Newer old hardware
- From: Bobbie Sellers
- Re: Newer old hardware
- From: GangGreene
- Newer old hardware
- Prev by Date: Re: Newer old hardware
- Next by Date: Re: Newer old hardware
- Previous by thread: Re: Newer old hardware
- Next by thread: Re: Newer old hardware
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|