Re: Newer old hardware
- From: Aragorn <stryder@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 08:12:13 +0200
On Wednesday 31 August 2011 08:07 in comp.os.linux.hardware, Henrik
Carlqvist enlightened humanity with the following words...:
GangGreene <GangGreene@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Bobbie Sellers wrote:
I don't see any reason to stick with 32 bit
versions unless you have a tool that won't work with
the 64 bit Linux.
That would be wine
Wine is one of the reasons to make sure that you choose a 64 bit
distribution with multilib support to also be able to run 32 bit
binary applications.
There are, of course - and I am thoroughly aware of how rare this has
become on Usenet these days - those of us who have no need for Wine,
since it is intended to run applications written for a pseudo operating
system, and the FLOSS version of Wine is either way limited to running
Wintendo applications for which there are much better native GNU/Linux
alternatives. ;-)
--
Aragorn
(registered GNU/Linux user #223157)
.
- References:
- Newer old hardware
- From: notbob
- Re: Newer old hardware
- From: Bobbie Sellers
- Re: Newer old hardware
- From: GangGreene
- Re: Newer old hardware
- From: Henrik Carlqvist
- Newer old hardware
- Prev by Date: Re: Newer old hardware
- Next by Date: Re: Newer old hardware
- Previous by thread: Re: Newer old hardware
- Next by thread: Re: Newer old hardware
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|