Re: why? glibc2.2 on redhat 8 has 2.3 reliance
From: Villy Kruse (vek_at_station02.ohout.pharmapartners.nl)
Date: 08/26/03
- Previous message: Peter T. Breuer: "Re: Software submission for Linux distributions"
- In reply to: Ian Collins: "why? glibc2.2 on redhat 8 has 2.3 reliance"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 26 Aug 2003 08:00:23 GMT
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003 09:23:36 +1200,
Ian Collins <ianc@kiwiplan.co.nz> wrote:
>
>Can anyone explain this please, and is there a way around it. I don't
>want to have to move development back to 7.3.
>
It would be safest if you would. If you develop and link on the oldest
system version you wan't to support chaces are quite high that the program
also works on the newer system. The other way around usualy does not work,
especialy as long as glibc changes at the rate it does at the moment. For
threaded programs you may find you need compile a RH9 version as well as a
pre RH9 version, if the RH7 version doesn't run properly on RH9.
Villy
- Previous message: Peter T. Breuer: "Re: Software submission for Linux distributions"
- In reply to: Ian Collins: "why? glibc2.2 on redhat 8 has 2.3 reliance"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
