Re: An Amazing Fact

tony_at_aplawrence.com
Date: 09/02/03 

Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 21:28:29 +0000 (UTC)

John Winters <newstmp@linuxemporium.co.uk> wrote:
>In article <kU35b.5848$tw6.4876@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net>,
>Alan Connor <alanconnor@earthlink.net> wrote:
>>You SAY that. Yet, for example, most mailing lists send RAVs and do not
>>suffer for subscribers.

>True, but there's a big difference between going through a challenge-response
>process when you're subscribing to something and doing it just so you can send
>an everyday e-mail. I subscribe to a mailing list perhaps once every 3
>months; I send dozens of e-mails every day (and no, not to the same people
>all the time).

>>And many websites require people to log in with a password and do not suffer
>>for visitors.

>How do you know? I know the contrary to be true because I have often
>stopped looking at websites which said, "You must register if you want
>to see more".

Absolutely. There are very few that I will register for.

And if I ever inquired to a business by email and got back a challenge,
they'd have to be the ONLY business selling whatever it was I was
looking for.

I wouldn't dare implement a challenge system for my email for
exactly that reason. RAV might be OK for individuals; it's not
suitable for business.

>>You've just touched on one of the reasons I abandoned the SA strategy: You
>>just can't design negative filters that can reliablly, over time, tell the
>>difference between spam and not spam. As soon as you think you have it
>>covered, the spammers change their ways again. The list of mail that you don't
>>want to receive is endless and forever changing form.

>True, but have you tried the Bayesian approach? It is astoundingly good
>at adjusting to changing requirements.

And, as I keep pointing out, nothing stops you from using multiple
approaches: procmail filters, sendmail access lists, Spamassassin,
Bayesian filters, and mail application filters. None of these
conflict.

--
tony@aplawrence.com Unix/Linux/Mac OS X resources: http://aplawrence.com
Get paid for writing about tech: http://aplawrence.com/publish.html

Relevant Pages

  • RE: bogofilter ate 3/5
    ... Subscribers subscribing one address ... respond to spam as well (well, unless you put a spam filter ... I'm sure there are some people that don't run mailing lists that would love to call this behavior 'bad'. ... I find it highly ironic that spam blocker services tell you not to use certain techniques (autoresponders, bounce messages) that are not only commonplace, but precedented and even mandated by RFC on the grounds that they may cause you to be blocked. ...
    (Linux-Kernel)
  • Re: Usenet abusers found RAMPS...move or sit it out?
    ... The filters, they do everything! ... voted on David Barr Yaffe's proposal to create RAMPS). ... moderate two lists, one for documentary filmmakers and another for ... Mailing lists aren't a perfect alternative to usenet. ...
    (rec.arts.movies.production.sound)
  • asp.net Mailing List software/components
    ... Can anyone recommend an asp.net mailing list system that we could attach to ... We're looking for a tool that can maintain multiple mailing lists, ... when we update certain content on the web site via the CMS). ... - ability for subscribers to sub/unsub themselves online ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet)
  • Re: [kde] Kmail filters
    ... When using Kmail filters setup on Mailing Lists it doesn't seem to work for ... I have to apply filters later on manually. ... Which KMail version do you use? ... For KDE 3.4 and lower, ...
    (KDE)
  • Re: Spamassassin and Spambayes
    ... found only two spam mails in my inbox - there were 313 classified spam ... For mailing lists to which you are subscribed you can use the ... Once I got Spambayes running, ... spam filters are last in the filter chain, and most of my filters are ...
    (Fedora)