Re: I am getting hammered by the MS Security Patch Spam.
From: Ed Murphy (emurphy42_at_socal.rr.com)
Date: 09/21/03
- Next message: Ed Murphy: "Re: I am getting hammered by the MS Security Patch Spam."
- Previous message: Michael Heiming: "Stats comp.os.linux.misc (last 7 days)"
- In reply to: Timothy Murphy: "Re: I am getting hammered by the MS Security Patch Spam."
- Next in thread: Scott: "Re: I am getting hammered by the MS Security Patch Spam."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2003 21:59:57 GMT
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003 17:28:43 +0100, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> I don't understand why ISPs --
> or someone higher up the chain --
> can't filter out this rubbish themselves.
> It hardly requires a degree in nuclear science to recognise it,
> and sending out the stuff
> must be multiplying their load by a large factor.
My ISP replaces the viral payloads with a short explanatory text file,
though it took them a day or two to add Swen to the filter. (Perhaps
their filters are updated by an automated daily process.) So I still
get the rubbish, but at least it's cut down to about 10% of its original
size. (So I'm still really glad that fetchmail and procmail are
automatically discarding most of it.)
I suppose they're worried that some virus will get the bright idea of
attaching itself to otherwise-legit messages. Personally, I'm willing
to risk losing such messages.
I do wish that ISPs would offer the following *options*:
* List of disallowed extensions (with a reasonable default set);
any attachment with one of these extensions is *assumed* to be
a virus, without bothering to look at its actual content
* Whether to trash the entire message, trash the attachment, or
store the attachment on a web server (so the user can retrieve
it if it's legit; older stuff is purged from storage as needed)
(Anyone wanting to send a legit Windows executable can zip it first,
which is also kinder and gentler on bandwidth.)
In fact, AOL is using spam filtering as a selling point, although
(a) I don't know whether it's server- or client-side
(b) I don't know whether they attempt to cover viruses
(c) I can't even find a web page on which AOL *clearly* explains
exactly what they offer. (Typical. AOL probably figures
most of their users are too stupid to understand it anyway.)
- Next message: Ed Murphy: "Re: I am getting hammered by the MS Security Patch Spam."
- Previous message: Michael Heiming: "Stats comp.os.linux.misc (last 7 days)"
- In reply to: Timothy Murphy: "Re: I am getting hammered by the MS Security Patch Spam."
- Next in thread: Scott: "Re: I am getting hammered by the MS Security Patch Spam."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|