Re: to sig or not to sig?
From: Owen Rees (orees_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 09/30/03
- Next message: Toby A Inkster: "Re: to sig or not to sig?"
- Previous message: Ed Murphy: "Re: to sig or not to sig?"
- In reply to: Sean G Gilley: "Re: to sig or not to sig?"
- Next in thread: Jim Hague: "Re: to sig or not to sig?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 22:56:04 +0100
On 30 Sep 2003 14:19:25 -0700, uem@mycroft.cmhnet.org (Sean G Gilley)
wrote in <ff37aa44.0309301319.6b5deb44@posting.google.com>:
>I don't have any problem knowing when a signature starts -- guess I don't
>really understand the problem there. And if you know when it starts, it
>doesn't really matter how long it is -- you just hit the key to go to the
>next message in the queue.
I don't want to have to move my finger off the space bar (page through
message to end then go to next unread) onto the 'n' key. Long signatures
are irritating, and I may choose to have my newsreader not show me posts
by people who use them. Network cost is not an issue to me, my reading
time is.
-- Owen Rees - opinions expressed here are mine; for a full disclaimer visit <http://homepages.tesco.net/~owen.rees/index.html#disclaimer> for e-mail use "owen.rees at tesco.net" instead of the From address
- Next message: Toby A Inkster: "Re: to sig or not to sig?"
- Previous message: Ed Murphy: "Re: to sig or not to sig?"
- In reply to: Sean G Gilley: "Re: to sig or not to sig?"
- Next in thread: Jim Hague: "Re: to sig or not to sig?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|