Re: The SpamSite: A Proposal
From: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (spamtrap_at_library.lspace.org.invalid)
Date: 10/01/03
- Next message: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz: "Re: The SpamSite: A Proposal"
- Previous message: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz: "Re: Why can't ISPs stop spam/virus ?!"
- Maybe in reply to: Chris F.A. Johnson: "Re: The SpamSite: A Proposal"
- Next in thread: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz: "Re: The SpamSite: A Proposal"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2003 11:41:00 -0400
In <5BEdb.7659$NX3.4953@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net>, on
09/28/2003
at 05:09 PM, Alan Connor <zzzzzz@xxx.yyy> said:
>My definition of "spam", and I prefer the term UM (Un-desirable Mail,
>because spam is only part of that picture), is any initial mail that
>has a false or dummy return address in it.
Do you work for the DMA? That is the only thing that could account for
such a clueless definition. As long as they identify themselves, it's
OK to send you a torrent of advertisements for automobiles, breast
enhancers, dietary supplements, golf balls, hotel rooms, investment
opportunities, paper, penis extenders, pornography, refinancing,
toner, viagra and whatnot? You are seriously out of touch with reality
if you expect many outside of Madison avenue to use the word the way
that you do.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
Unsolicited bulk E-mail will be subject to legal action. I reserve
the right to publicly post or ridicule any abusive E-mail.
Reply to domain Patriot dot net user shmuel+news to contact me. Do
not reply to spamtrap@library.lspace.org
- Next message: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz: "Re: The SpamSite: A Proposal"
- Previous message: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz: "Re: Why can't ISPs stop spam/virus ?!"
- Maybe in reply to: Chris F.A. Johnson: "Re: The SpamSite: A Proposal"
- Next in thread: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz: "Re: The SpamSite: A Proposal"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|