Re: to sig or not to sig?
From: Alan Connor (zzzzzz_at_xxx.yyy)
Date: 10/01/03
- Next message: ge0rge: "Re: to sig or not to sig?"
- Previous message: nobody_at_nowhere.com: "Re: how to add a disk with XP (NTFS) to a Linux PC - the process is blocked by partiton check"
- In reply to: Floyd Davidson: "Re: to sig or not to sig?"
- Next in thread: Christopher Browne: "Re: to sig or not to sig?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2003 21:09:17 GMT
On 01 Oct 2003 10:57:14 -0800, Floyd Davidson <floyd@barrow.com> wrote:
>
>>And this is before we even start to think about the client machines!
>>
>>I think I ought to stop this post immediately!
>
> Perhaps... ;-)
>
> On the other hand, by that measure, Alan Connor should never
> post another word, not even one. ;-(
>
And that's one of the most wonderful things about the Usenet:
People who would deprive those with views contrary to theirs of the right of
public free speech have no power to do so.
They are forced to try to dis-credit the person and all he/she has to do is
stand back and let them dig their own grave.
It becomes obvious in short order when a person or group is not being honest
and/or fair in their criticisms and assertions.
And only fools take a single word posted on the Usenet at face value.
-- Later, Alan C You can find my email address at the website: contact.html take control of your mailbox ----- elrav1 ----- http://tinyurl.com/l55a
- Next message: ge0rge: "Re: to sig or not to sig?"
- Previous message: nobody_at_nowhere.com: "Re: how to add a disk with XP (NTFS) to a Linux PC - the process is blocked by partiton check"
- In reply to: Floyd Davidson: "Re: to sig or not to sig?"
- Next in thread: Christopher Browne: "Re: to sig or not to sig?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
