Re: to sig or not to sig?
From: Keith Keller (kkeller-usenet_at_wombat.san-francisco.ca.us)
Date: 10/02/03
- Next message: futureworlds: "Re: Can "pppd" bind to a pty with "telnet" session over ethernet?"
- Previous message: Captain Dondo: "Re: Slow memory leak"
- In reply to: Alan Connor: "Re: to sig or not to sig?"
- Next in thread: Andy Baxter: "Re: to sig or not to sig?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2003 08:33:10 -0700
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 2003-10-01, Alan Connor <zzzzzz@xxx.yyy> wrote:
> That last statement isn't true. I keep hearing that over and over again
> from PGP fans. But I KNOW someone who could beat that system and does so
> for fun on a regular basis. And he isn't even particularly advanced as
> a hacker.
We're still waiting for substantiation of this claim. Why should
anyone take *your* word for it?
- --keith
- --
kkeller-usenet@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us
(try just my userid to email me)
AOLSFAQ=http://wombat.san-francisco.ca.us/cgi-bin/fom
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iEYEARECAAYFAj98RTQACgkQhVcNCxZ5ID95EgCcCJimdAzg4mXlwclnk0PBZLTJ
8AoAn13HLonHp6nfwU1+sYuNnCkWV+0s
=U5PB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Next message: futureworlds: "Re: Can "pppd" bind to a pty with "telnet" session over ethernet?"
- Previous message: Captain Dondo: "Re: Slow memory leak"
- In reply to: Alan Connor: "Re: to sig or not to sig?"
- Next in thread: Andy Baxter: "Re: to sig or not to sig?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|