Re: mozilla vs shtml
From: Dave Millen (postmaster_at_[127.0.0.1)
Date: 10/09/03
- Next message: Dances With Crows: "Re: Removing Grub"
- Previous message: RHR: "Removing Grub"
- In reply to: Dave Brown: "mozilla vs shtml"
- Next in thread: Kirk Strauser: "Re: mozilla vs shtml"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2003 18:41:05 +0100
On Thu, 09 Oct 2003 17:21:36 +0000, Dave Brown wrote:
> The past day or 2, my mozilla browser seems to be unable to render several
> URLs served as ".shtml" pages. Has something "broken" or have the sources
> added something to those pages which mozilla can't handle?
>
> I've always assumed that there wasn't really any difference between .html
> and .shtml other than the way they were tranmitted. Perhaps this is not
> true?
My guess would be that the problem lies at the server end. AFAIAA your
assumption is correct, *but* the server(apache at least) has to be
configured to serve shtml.
>From an apache httpd.conf:
#
# To use server-parsed HTML files
#
AddType text/html .shtml
AddHandler server-parsed .shtml
Regards,
Dave
- Next message: Dances With Crows: "Re: Removing Grub"
- Previous message: RHR: "Removing Grub"
- In reply to: Dave Brown: "mozilla vs shtml"
- Next in thread: Kirk Strauser: "Re: mozilla vs shtml"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|