Re: Rejecting Korporate Linux
From: Burgess Meredith (jabailo_at_earthlink.net)
Date: 10/11/03
- Next message: Andrew Schultz: "Re: NSF problem on Redhat 9"
- Previous message: Joseph Cipale: "Linux networking Q"
- In reply to: Alan Connor: "Re: Rejecting Korporate Linux"
- Next in thread: Alan Connor: "Re: Rejecting Korporate Linux"
- Reply: Alan Connor: "Re: Rejecting Korporate Linux"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 18:08:41 GMT
I suffered through the interminal drivel, that the Dynamic Dummies, Alan
Connor-Man, and the Boy Blunder had to say,
> It will allow the participation of cultures that are actually different from
> this one, rather than just our de facto colonies, to the great benefit of
> all concerned.
There will be two types of corporate linux.
Type I
M$ style - bought from redHat and tuned by 'consultants'
Good for system admins.
Type II
Larger corporations will soon figure that they
can higher their own kernel and system developers
to make their GM, Boeing, or Wal*Mart Linux (internal)
do exactly what they want it to do.
- Next message: Andrew Schultz: "Re: NSF problem on Redhat 9"
- Previous message: Joseph Cipale: "Linux networking Q"
- In reply to: Alan Connor: "Re: Rejecting Korporate Linux"
- Next in thread: Alan Connor: "Re: Rejecting Korporate Linux"
- Reply: Alan Connor: "Re: Rejecting Korporate Linux"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]