Re: Rejecting Korporate Linux

From: Alan Connor (zzzzzz_at_xxx.yyy)
Date: 10/12/03 

Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2003 06:59:10 GMT

On Sun, 12 Oct 2003 06:36:21 GMT, student <student@linuxbox.anom.com> wrote:
> The future of Linux distributions
> depends critically on how well they perform ( and in some cases whether
> they can improve their performance) in meeting _all_ of these requirements.
>

Interesting. But a slight correction: The future of *corporate Linux*
is what you are referring to.

None of what you have to say has the slightest relevance to the Linux that
myself and many, many others owe allegiance to.

The only thing they can do is block us from websites and services that we
have no interest in. <chuckle>

We have all the software we will ever need, which we can modify and extend
at will, stored safely off the Internet.

The freedom of the Internet must drive these poor fascists absolutely
crazy. You see a lot of that on the Usenet, where people go berserk when
they discover that they simply lack the power to silence those with points-
of-view that differ from theirs. 

-- 
Later, Alan C
You can find my email address at the website: contact.html
take control of your mailbox ----- elrav1 ----- http://tinyurl.com/l55a

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Are real companies using/supporting Linux?
    ... >> Home Depot - thousands of LINUX licenses ... > * Vigilant Internet services Ltd. ... > * Netscape Communications Corp. ... > * Pitrich Information Technologies ...
    (comp.os.linux.security)
  • Re: Are real companies using/supporting Linux?
    ... linux systems to implement its search & display capability. ... > * Vigilant Internet services Ltd. ... > * Netscape Communications Corp. ... > * Neuron Consultants Pvt. ...
    (comp.os.linux.security)
  • Re: Are real companies using/supporting Linux?
    ... >use of Linux to support their day-to-day business function. ... >Vigilant Internet services Ltd. ... >New Age Consulting Service, Inc. ... >Pitrich Information Technologies ...
    (comp.os.linux.security)
  • Re: M$ attack on Common Sense
    ... That would work in Linux without the user knowing it was working? ... Try reading the *numerous* websites that advocate Linux.... ... They're all vulnerabilities and/or flaws in the OS due to bad ... I know how to maintain my computers and the OS'es I choose to run on ...
    (comp.os.linux.misc)
  • Re: M$ attack on Common Sense
    ... That would work in Linux without the user knowing it was working? ... Try reading the *numerous* websites that advocate Linux.... ... They're all vulnerabilities and/or flaws in the OS due to bad ... I know how to maintain my computers and the OS'es I choose to run on ...
    (alt.computer.security)