Confused about location of /boot
From: David Haggett (news-spam_at_haggett.demon.co.uk)
Date: 10/12/03
- Next message: Davide Bianchi: "Re: Confused about location of /boot"
- Previous message: Tristan Miller: "fetchmail: what's the point?"
- Next in thread: Davide Bianchi: "Re: Confused about location of /boot"
- Reply: Davide Bianchi: "Re: Confused about location of /boot"
- Reply: mjt: "Re: Confused about location of /boot"
- Reply: Dave Brown: "Re: Confused about location of /boot"
- Reply: Robert Heller: "Re: Confused about location of /boot"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2003 18:20:53 +0100
Can anyone confirm whether the cylinder 1024 rule is still valid with a
modern (up-to-the-minute) PC? I've googled, but all the articles I've
seen appear to have been written 4 years ago.
Is that because the rule has been superceded by recent hardware/software
developments?
For background, I'm expecting to dual-boot Mandrake 9.2 on a laptop with
WinXP pre-installed, and I'd like to leave the first 30GB for Windows for
an easy-life.
TIA
-- David Haggett Linux user since 01/01/2003 Email: david<at>haggett<dot>demon<dot>co<dot>uk
- Next message: Davide Bianchi: "Re: Confused about location of /boot"
- Previous message: Tristan Miller: "fetchmail: what's the point?"
- Next in thread: Davide Bianchi: "Re: Confused about location of /boot"
- Reply: Davide Bianchi: "Re: Confused about location of /boot"
- Reply: mjt: "Re: Confused about location of /boot"
- Reply: Dave Brown: "Re: Confused about location of /boot"
- Reply: Robert Heller: "Re: Confused about location of /boot"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|