SpamAssassin 2.60's sa-learn MUCH SLOWER

From: Kevin (nobody_at_tex.kom)
Date: 10/31/03 

Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 18:06:41 GMT

Has anyone else upgraded from SpamAssassin 2.54 to 2.60?
When I did I noticed that sa-learn (bayesian spam learning) is
dramaticly slower. Anyone else have an observation on this?

Thanks.... 

-- 
Unless otherwise noted, the statements herein reflect my personal
opinions and not those of any organization with which I may be affiliated.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: How do I check if Spamassassin bayes learning works?
    ... database files by running 'sa-learn --sync'. ... Is there a way to check or see if spamassassin is actualy using the ... usage of the Bayes rules, ... sync atime ...
    (Debian-User)
  • sa-learn and spamassassins markup
    ... Does sa-learn recognize and ignore spamassassin's markup? ... semi-tedious process of piping through spamassassin -d and then into ... The spamassassin manpage says that -r ...
    (Debian-User)
  • RE: spamassassin salearn
    ... John-Paul Stewart writes:>Will Renkel wrote:>> Where does sa-kearn store its gained knowledge? ... it won't work if you run sa-learn as your normal user but run>spamassassin site-wide as a different user. ...
    (comp.os.linux.misc)
  • Re: spamassassin setup with Evo - Edgy
    ... for running sa-learn multiple times against the same messages) ... ... known spam messages handy in case you need to re-train so I wouldn't ... Learn the input messageas ham. ... of the messages as spam, SpamAssassin will forget them first, then ...
    (Ubuntu)
  • Re: bayesian spamassassin throwing error
    ... whenever i try to pipe a message to sa-learn ... > the threshold that it would try to auto-learn it. ... Does feeding mail to "spamassassin" itself work? ... Is your homedir mounted over NFS? ...
    (Debian-User)