Re: ordering in linux 'ls -la'
From: Michael Heiming (michael+USENET_at_www.heiming.de)
Date: 11/30/03
- Previous message: Joseph: "Re: Copy Protection?!"
- In reply to: Digital Puer: "ordering in linux 'ls -la'"
- Next in thread: Michael Heiming: "Re: ordering in linux 'ls -la'"
- Reply: Michael Heiming: "Re: ordering in linux 'ls -la'"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 00:55:25 +0100
In comp.os.linux.misc Digital Puer <digital_puer@hotjail.comet> wrote:
> The 'ls -la' command is returning a different ordering of files
> between Solaris and Linux with respect to dot-files.
> Under Solaris (which I'm accustomed to using), ls -la returns
> the following:
[..]
> Under Red Hat Linux, it returns the following (note the intermixing
> of dot-files with regular files):
Has nothing to do with solaris/linux, try:
$ locale
For system wide settings look on the RH box at:
/etc/sysconfig/i18n
AFAIR /etc/default/init, on solaris.
However, I guess all you need in i18n is:
LC_COLLATE="POSIX"
Good luck
-- Michael Heiming Remove +SIGNS and www. if you expect an answer, sorry for inconvenience, but I get tons of SPAM
- Previous message: Joseph: "Re: Copy Protection?!"
- In reply to: Digital Puer: "ordering in linux 'ls -la'"
- Next in thread: Michael Heiming: "Re: ordering in linux 'ls -la'"
- Reply: Michael Heiming: "Re: ordering in linux 'ls -la'"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
