Re: dd too slow
From: Hactar (ebenONE_at_tampabay.ARE-ARE.com.unmunge)
Date: 12/20/03
- Next message: Jim Richardson: "Re: dd too slow"
- Previous message: Scott: "Re: DOS equivalent of Unix 'rename'?"
- In reply to: Scott: "dd too slow"
- Next in thread: Jim Richardson: "Re: dd too slow"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2003 06:31:15 GMT
In article <1194537.b5n3qNTTIY@sig.kremlin.ru>, Scott <root@localhost> wrote:
> I had to copy one HDD to another of same brand-size-model and it took more
> than 6 hours (I left it running) for 40GB UDMA 100 hard drives.
>
> I used these command options
> dd if=/dev/hda of=/dev/hdc bc=1M
^^
bs?
It takes about an hour for two identical 120 GB drives (Hitachi
IC35L120AVV207-0), using the command
dd if=/dev/hda of=/dev/hdc bs={1,2,4,8,16}k
I'm trying to find the pattern that relates block size and total time. So
far it seems that doubling the block size reduces the total time by .5-1.5
minutes. Experiments continue...
> is this a normal speed for this size?
I'd say "no". Your drives are probably somewhat slower than mine (they're
smaller, after all), but 18 times slower is hard to believe.
> would hdparam do any good?
Check it out. Make sure DMA is on. Multi-sector transfers probably would
help too.
--
-eben ebQenW1@EtaRmpTabYayU.rIr.OcoPm home.tampabay.rr.com/hactar
Q: What kind of modem did Jimi Hendrix use?
A: A purple Hayes.
- Next message: Jim Richardson: "Re: dd too slow"
- Previous message: Scott: "Re: DOS equivalent of Unix 'rename'?"
- In reply to: Scott: "dd too slow"
- Next in thread: Jim Richardson: "Re: dd too slow"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|