Re: Are LinuxThreads real kernel-level threads?
From: Todd Knarr (tknarr_at_silverglass.org)
Date: 01/04/04
- Next message: joe_at_invalid.address: "Re: Opensource - anything goes?"
- Previous message: Dan Espen: "Re: Are LinuxThreads real kernel-level threads?"
- In reply to: Noah Roberts: "Re: Are LinuxThreads real kernel-level threads?"
- Next in thread: Noah Roberts: "Re: Are LinuxThreads real kernel-level threads?"
- Reply: Noah Roberts: "Re: Are LinuxThreads real kernel-level threads?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2004 20:40:27 GMT
In comp.os.linux.misc <bt9t4a$95$1@quark.scn.rain.com> Noah Roberts <nroberts@dontemailme.com> wrote:
> Oh good, they fixed it....oops no they didn't. No magic done, just
> ignore the issue:
Ah, a non-NPTL kernel. Yes, prior to NPTL threads had independent
process IDs. Which distribution are you using? I'd thought even the
stock kernels had NPTL in them as of recent versions. I'd certainly
recommend applying the NPTL patches, they've been IME highly stable.
--
All I want out of the Universe is 10 minutes with the source code and
a quick recompile.
-- unknown
- Next message: joe_at_invalid.address: "Re: Opensource - anything goes?"
- Previous message: Dan Espen: "Re: Are LinuxThreads real kernel-level threads?"
- In reply to: Noah Roberts: "Re: Are LinuxThreads real kernel-level threads?"
- Next in thread: Noah Roberts: "Re: Are LinuxThreads real kernel-level threads?"
- Reply: Noah Roberts: "Re: Are LinuxThreads real kernel-level threads?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
