Re: DSL vs Cable modem ---what is difference when connecting to internet?

From: Robert Heller (heller_at_deepsoft.com)
Date: 01/09/04


Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 11:55:07 +0000


  notbob <notbob@nothome.com>,
  In a message on Fri, 09 Jan 2004 02:38:57 GMT, wrote :

n> On 2004-01-08, Robb <RobeDap6@u6u9ytezhu.com> wrote:
n>
n> > (1)use pppoe for DSL, what protocol for Cable modem?
n>
n> DOCSIS ethernet
n>
n> > (2)what kinds of setting files are the same , and what kinds of setting files are the different?
n>
n> I can't think of a single linux that doesn't have some simple script to help
n> you set up DHCP. It's a snap.
n>
n> > (3)when use DSL, there is no need to know Mac address of NIC, when use cable modem,
n> > is there a need to know Mac address of network card?
n>
n> It's a nonissue.
n>
n> > (4)....?
n>
n> DSL speed is totally dependent on your distance from the central office
n> (CO), the telephone company's local switching station. The farther from it,
n> the slower your speed, not matter how much you pay or what they tell you.
n> With cable, it doesn't matter where you are. If you can get cable, you'll
n> get the maximum speed available (depending on load).

Cable modem speed has exactly the same speed/throughput issues as thick
or thin EtherNet. You are 'sharing' a piece of copper with other
network nodes (other cable modem customers on your 'block'). If no one
else is using the bandwidth you get all it to yourself. If everybody
else is also using the bandwidth you get 1/Nth of the bandwidth (N ==
total number of concurrent users).

n>
n> > (5)....?
n>
n> At one time, DSL was a better deal. But that's all changed. Right now,
n> Comcast cable is a better bargain. The market is constantly evolving and
n> Comcast has recently doubled their initial speed offerings on broadband
n> cable. In most places it's now 2.5M/256K, double the speed from when Comcast
n> took over from AT&T. This is typically $45-50 mo. DSL typically costs $80
n> mo, or higher, for these speeds. One catch! If you don't have Comcast
n> cable tv, they are going to punish you with an extra $10-15 fee on broadband
n> cable only. It's a dirty trick, but it's their ball.
n>
n> I was going to switch to DSL (I'm real close to the CO), but have changed my
n> mind. This because no DSL provider can now beat cable's speed/price (I
n> already have ulta basic cable tv ($15), so don't get the penalty fee).
n>
n> Everything you want to know ...and more!... is available at:
n>
n> http://www.dslreports.com/
n>
n> nb
n>

                                     \/
Robert Heller ||InterNet: heller@cs.umass.edu
http://vis-www.cs.umass.edu/~heller || heller@deepsoft.com
http://www.deepsoft.com /\FidoNet: 1:321/153

              



Relevant Pages

  • Re: DSL vs. cable throughout the country
    ... advantage cable modem has is greater POTENTIAL download speed. ... you only achieve those higher speeds at low traffic times, ... DSL, it's usually in your local ILEC Central Office. ...
    (misc.consumers)
  • Re: DSL vs Cable modem ---what is difference when connecting to internet?
    ... DSL was a better deal. ... Comcast cable is a better bargain. ... mo, or higher, for these speeds. ... already have ulta basic cable tv, so don't get the penalty fee). ...
    (comp.os.linux.misc)
  • Re: (RCSD) Screen capture software for free
    ... That doesn't sound like DSL, ... but up here in 'Dacker country we get at least a 1230 kbps ... It will then check your download and upload speeds. ... That's because AOL did all of the hand holding. ...
    (rec.collecting.stamps.discuss)
  • Re: Minimum needed for XP, sp2 smooth running.
    ... cable modem and it's really slow (he used to have DSL, ... companies and what speeds they provide, but as a general rule cable ... 384 MB RAM now, and since he switched to cable modem, it's really slow ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
  • Re: Finally! The cable monopoly might fall (OT for a couple of newsgroups)
    ... Now with DSL I achieve constant speeds of about 2000Kbps....no worrying about ... > This is about high speed Internet via cable. ... > of Appeals to revisit the decision, but the court declined to do so ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics)