Re: "hda: lost interrupt"
From: jamin (ben_at_ghost.merseine.nu)
Date: 02/19/04
- Next message: jamin: "Re: changing non-main route table?"
- Previous message: tony_at_pcunix.com: "Re: Is Caldera dead?"
- In reply to: Joe: "Re: "hda: lost interrupt""
- Next in thread: Timm Brinkmann: "Re: "hda: lost interrupt""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 11:25:20 +0000
joe@jretrading.com schreef:
> Windows 98 took some rebooting (about a dozen) and much ministering with
> driver CDs but it finally got its act together. NT4.0 hardly even
> noticed the change, just needing another network driver.
NT4 remains the best Win32 M$ have ever brought to market IMNSHO..
this goes to prove it. I still use it on a 'teaching' box :). And it's
also dead stable inside VMWare, unlike any other flavour..
-- Groetjes....j -- <-------------------------------------------------------------------> |w: http://ghost.merseine.nu | |e: jamin dot davis at mail dot ee | jamin dot flashmail dot com | |l: 53.42n 2.08w | <------------------------------------------------------------------->
- Next message: jamin: "Re: changing non-main route table?"
- Previous message: tony_at_pcunix.com: "Re: Is Caldera dead?"
- In reply to: Joe: "Re: "hda: lost interrupt""
- Next in thread: Timm Brinkmann: "Re: "hda: lost interrupt""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]