Re: VS.NET is too EXPENSIVE. Developers switching rapidly from it.

From: Mike Cox (mikecoxlinux_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 03/29/04 

Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 15:37:01 -0800

In article <p5f74c.9ec.ln@news.heiming.de>, "Michael Heiming"
<michael+USENET@www.heiming.de> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> Philip Callan <callanca@shaw.ca> wrote:
>> Ed Kaim [MSFT] wrote:
>> > The only really effective arguments you could make for not using
>> > Visual Studio would be if you need to build cross-platform client
>> > applications or if you're trying to take the company down from the
>> > inside.
>
>> Is not the purpose of .net to provide 'cross-platform client
>> applications' or am I missing the purpose of mono in that people in OSS
>> are choosing to develop for a language that /only/ supports MS Windows
>> products?
> AFAIR the OP wrote just a short time ago, he would be 13 years old.
> Now:

I'm 34.

> "At my company, I'm an MS proponent"
> Unless this is forged, but it doesn't look like, I smell a troll! - --
> Michael Heiming - RHCE (GPG-Key ID: 0xEDD27B94) Remove +SIGNS and www.
> if you expect an answer, sorry for inconvenience, but I get tons of
> spam. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
> iD8DBQFAZz/3AkPEju3Se5QRAue3AKChnELOWag1xe+adwtw2yEBvLs4FACfU4on
> cBSrfFRzmsZlEs4khtaldGI=
> =DRDr
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Relevant Pages