Re: System clock modified after crash

From: P Gentry (rdgentry1_at_cablelynx.com)
Date: 05/05/04


Date: 5 May 2004 08:43:33 -0700

Neil W Rickert <rickert+nn@cs.niu.edu> wrote in message news:<c78m0d$3ft$1@usenet.cso.niu.edu>...
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
[snip]
>
> Until recently, everything worked fine for me. I told windows to not
> change the time. I changed it in unix (solaris in this case).
>
> Then I installed XP.
>
> As before, the time change was made in solaris (by a cron job).
>
> When I next booted XP, apparently the XP logic said:
>
> The hardware clock has been changed to daylight savings time (presumably
> there is a flag setting somewhere).
>
> XP has not been told to change to daylight savings time.
>
> Therefore, change the hardware clock back to standard time.
>
> It seems that, if running XP, you must allow XP to do the clock changes.
>
> No doubt this is part of Bill Gates' diabolical plan to rule the
> universe :-(

More like "let there be chaos", IMO.

>From Win 3.x days I learned to not let Windows touch the RTC if at all
possible -- for a stand alone sysytem, understand. It's not always
easy to ferret out the many (inconsistent) ways of the Windows clock
and timestamps.

Just (web) Google this string for a glimpse (it's even scarier when
googling groups):
windows xp time change daylight savings

Had not checked the tech pages recently and it appears that they've
screwed it up again -- at least in some specific situations, eg., time
based printer availability. The many and never ending joys of Windows
...

For a quick taste you can try these that pop up at the top of the
Google returns:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;830483&Product=WinXP
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;822806&Product=WinXP
http://www.annoyances.org/exec/forum/winxp/1082073770
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;129574

Windows clock/timestamp behavior can be very dependent on the
environment you run in and not simply the settings on a particular
machine -- oh joy, oh joy!

hth,
prg
email above disabled



Relevant Pages

  • Re: FTC Complaint filed
    ... I am playing around with Solaris and zones, and attempting to run the DOS/Win3.1,'95/98/98SE apps, each in it's own zone if needed, using WINE. ... There's nothing wrong with COBOL but there are a lot of alternatives better suited for quick-and-dirty programming on the PC. ... I have long said, in my opinion and pre-Vista, that Windows 95 was the best OS Microsoft ever made. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsmedia.player)
  • Re: MS again admits being guilty for the PC Game decline
    ... his life to the whims of Google, ... Solaris) but I still have no intention of using on my home PC as the two things I do on it are play games and use the internet. ... Windows XP may not be perfect for that but I buggered if it's not good enough. ...
    (comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action)
  • Re: OT: Comparison of Unix systems and window managers
    ... Interesting that the system board date is unset in the Ultra-60: ... The machine was also plenty fast enough to run Solaris 10 ... used from Windows 95 until Windows 2000 Professional. ... use reliable pre-compiled packages if I can, ...
    (rec.crafts.metalworking)
  • Re: How can I see long file names on Windows CD under Solaris ?
    ... If I then mount that with lofiadm, or write it to a CD, only short files names are seen in Solaris. ... If I stick the CD in a Windows PC, so the full length file names are seen. ... I'm not sure if the 31 characters permitted by -l will be sufficient. ...
    (comp.unix.solaris)
  • Re: Ethernet statistics
    ... > on Windows? ... Solaris - what else but kstat ... maintain them - on Linux too. ... >>acceptable from an enterprise perspective. ...
    (comp.os.linux.networking)