Re: CPIO VS TAR for Backup?
From: Jean-David Beyer (jdbeyer_at_exit109.com)
Date: 06/24/04
- Next message: Chris-likes-Linux: "Re: [SSH-RSYNC] re-connecting to a backgrounded job(RSYNC) after SSH disconnection"
- Previous message: Jean-David Beyer: "Re: CPIO VS TAR for Backup?"
- In reply to: Frank Miles: "Re: CPIO VS TAR for Backup?"
- Next in thread: Jean-David Beyer: "Re: CPIO VS TAR for Backup?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 15:17:28 -0400
Frank Miles wrote:
>
> IIRC One problem with tar is that if you use compression, and your
> media develop a single-bit glitch, you can use the entire archive.
> Afio does file-by-file compression, so is a safer method: a
> single-bit-glitch should only result in the loss of a single file.
>
Sure. But do not most modern tape drives use hardware compression? All the
ones I have used, even dumb QIC tape drives that I used in 1996 have that
feature. And that surely is done on a file-at-a-time basis or even at a
block at a time basis. So who cares what software compression methods are
used unless you must read an old archive tape?
-- .~. Jean-David Beyer Registered Linux User 85642. /V\ Registered Machine 241939. /( )\ Shrewsbury, New Jersey http://counter.li.org ^^-^^ 15:15:00 up 2 days, 4:46, 5 users, load average: 2.18, 2.13, 2.09
- Next message: Chris-likes-Linux: "Re: [SSH-RSYNC] re-connecting to a backgrounded job(RSYNC) after SSH disconnection"
- Previous message: Jean-David Beyer: "Re: CPIO VS TAR for Backup?"
- In reply to: Frank Miles: "Re: CPIO VS TAR for Backup?"
- Next in thread: Jean-David Beyer: "Re: CPIO VS TAR for Backup?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
Loading