Re: Why not XML based configurationfiles?
From: Richard Steiner (rsteiner_at_visi.com)
Date: 07/07/04
- Next message: Grant Edwards: "Re: linspire email Client"
- Previous message: Keith Keller: "Re: linspire email Client"
- In reply to: Alexander Skwar: "Re: Why not XML based configurationfiles?"
- Next in thread: Alexander Skwar: "Re: Why not XML based configurationfiles?"
- Reply: Alexander Skwar: "Re: Why not XML based configurationfiles?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2004 14:41:22 -0500
Here in comp.os.linux.misc,
Alexander Skwar <from@alexander.skwar.name> spake unto us, saying:
>But, XML is not the main point here - the standard toolset is. But
>boneheads like Michael see a suggestion and attack everybody who dares to
>not think like him.
The dotfile generator is a possible approach, and would be very nice if
its use were expanded.
http://www.blackie.dk/dotfile/
I personally like using tools like Webmin to perform common admit tasks
on my own local boxes. That provides a fairly standard GUI for a number
of different things.
-- -Rich Steiner >>>---> http://www.visi.com/~rsteiner >>>---> Eden Prairie, MN OS/2 + eCS + Linux + Win95 + DOS + PC/GEOS + Executor = PC Hobbyist Heaven! Applications analyst/designer/developer (14 yrs) seeking employment. See web site above for resume/CV and background.
- Next message: Grant Edwards: "Re: linspire email Client"
- Previous message: Keith Keller: "Re: linspire email Client"
- In reply to: Alexander Skwar: "Re: Why not XML based configurationfiles?"
- Next in thread: Alexander Skwar: "Re: Why not XML based configurationfiles?"
- Reply: Alexander Skwar: "Re: Why not XML based configurationfiles?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|