Re: Switching from tcsh to bash as an interactive shell
From: Juhan Leemet (juhan_at_logicognosis.com)
Date: 09/20/04
- Next message: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz: "Re: octet vs. byte [Was re: partition size limit]"
- Previous message: Juhan Leemet: "Re: linux serial programming"
- In reply to: Dana French: "Re: Switching from tcsh to bash as an interactive shell"
- Next in thread: Jeroen Geilman: "Re: Switching from tcsh to bash as an interactive shell"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 15:19:10 -0200
On Tue, 14 Sep 2004 08:56:28 -0700, Dana French wrote:
> "Tony Lawrence" <pcunix@gmail.com> wrote in message news:<ci4mei$354@odah37.prod.google.com>...
>> William Park wrote:
>> > Tony Lawrence <pcunix@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > Finally, you are assuming that someone thinks bash is cool...
>> > > compared to Perl or Python.
>>
>> OK. Never disparage a man's goddess. If bash answers...
>
> And on an unrelated topic: vi sucks!!! Long live EMACS!!! :) There,
> that should settle that issue once and for all ....
We're sharpening our swords!!! :^)
Actually, I used to really, really like emacs, but then ended up on some
platforms that only had vi. Now I'm used to that. Time to come back in
from the cold? ...been looking at hemlock for lisp, btw, fwiw...
-- Juhan Leemet Logicognosis, Inc.
- Next message: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz: "Re: octet vs. byte [Was re: partition size limit]"
- Previous message: Juhan Leemet: "Re: linux serial programming"
- In reply to: Dana French: "Re: Switching from tcsh to bash as an interactive shell"
- Next in thread: Jeroen Geilman: "Re: Switching from tcsh to bash as an interactive shell"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]