Re: SPF = Sender Policy Framework
From: Paul Vader (pv+usenet_at_pobox.com)
Date: 09/22/04
- Next message: Moe Trin: "Re: octet vs. byte [Was re: partition size limit]"
- Previous message: Moe Trin: "Re: Hanging"
- In reply to: Alexander Skwar: "Re: SPF = Sender Policy Framework"
- Next in thread: Alexander Skwar: "Re: SPF = Sender Policy Framework"
- Reply: Alexander Skwar: "Re: SPF = Sender Policy Framework"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 20:15:33 -0000
reply-to@alexander.skwar.name writes:
>> OK, so you've now got a system where the recipient is always listed in
>> the Cc. Now what?
>
>For mass mailers, doing the mailing is a bit more expensive.
Feh. Spammers aren't paying for sending spam - that's the zombie's job. *
--
* PV something like badgers--something like lizards--and something
like corkscrews.
- Next message: Moe Trin: "Re: octet vs. byte [Was re: partition size limit]"
- Previous message: Moe Trin: "Re: Hanging"
- In reply to: Alexander Skwar: "Re: SPF = Sender Policy Framework"
- Next in thread: Alexander Skwar: "Re: SPF = Sender Policy Framework"
- Reply: Alexander Skwar: "Re: SPF = Sender Policy Framework"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|