Re: Configuring services for unusual ports
From: Brendon Caligari (bcaligari_at_nospam.fireforged.com)
Date: 12/13/04
- Next message: Grant Edwards: "Re: Single floppy linux with network support to rescue files on hard-disk"
- Previous message: Peter Köhlmann: "Re: "Torn between two OS" - Solaris vs Linux"
- In reply to: Conner Destron: "Re: Configuring services for unusual ports"
- Next in thread: Conner Destron: "Re: Configuring services for unusual ports"
- Reply: Conner Destron: "Re: Configuring services for unusual ports"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 15:39:17 +0000
Conner Destron wrote:
> "Brendon Caligari" wrote:
>
>>Conner Destron wrote:
>>
>>>"IANAL_VISTA" wrote:
>>>
>>>>"Conner Destron" wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Ok, I'll bite, why is telnet such a bad idea? Or, to phrase it
>>>>>differently, why is ssh so much better?
>>>>
>>>>Simply put ssh encrypts the packets between the two systems.
>>>>With telnet passwords & all other traffic is sent in clear text
>>>>which leave the risk of it being sniffed & compromised.
>>>
>>>So it's basically just the concern about sending clear-text?
>>
>>Well...it does go bitta beyond that...like you know that
>>1) the machine your're talking to IS the machine you believe you're
>>talking to.
>>2) data exchanged is not not tampared with - i.e. nobody along the way can
>>insert any new packet 'faking it' as part of the original conversation.
>>3) anybody listening in to the conversation will not be able to decipher
>>what is being exchanged.
>>
>>ssh is more than just secure terminal access. The same keys and port 22
>>can be used for file copy (scp) and file transfer (sftp). Somebody else
>>already mentioned the joys of passwordless authentication and tunneling.
>
>
> Ok, so, SSH clears up the clear text issues, thus avoiding possible
> spoofing/tampering/eavesdropping (without serious effort), and uses keys to
> verify the identity of the machine, if you already have the right key for
> that machine to verify against.... and it also lets you run some other
> services via tunneling through the same port. Guess it sounds better, but
> damn I'm awfully used to telnet. ;)
> -=Conner=-
>
In practice for every day stuff it doesn't get any more complicated.
Just fire up PuTTY (which is also just as capable a telnet client) and
press a button (yes...it has a nice address book).
B.
- Next message: Grant Edwards: "Re: Single floppy linux with network support to rescue files on hard-disk"
- Previous message: Peter Köhlmann: "Re: "Torn between two OS" - Solaris vs Linux"
- In reply to: Conner Destron: "Re: Configuring services for unusual ports"
- Next in thread: Conner Destron: "Re: Configuring services for unusual ports"
- Reply: Conner Destron: "Re: Configuring services for unusual ports"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|