Re: "Torn between two OS" - Solaris vs Linux
From: Chris Newport (me_at_see-my-sig.invalid)
Date: 01/03/05
- Next message: Tim Hogard: "Re: "Torn between two OS" - Solaris vs Linux"
- Previous message: notbob: "Re: Can anyone print this PDF with acroread?"
- In reply to: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz: "Re: "Torn between two OS" - Solaris vs Linux"
- Next in thread: Joerg Schilling: "Re: "Torn between two OS" - Solaris vs Linux"
- Reply: Joerg Schilling: "Re: "Torn between two OS" - Solaris vs Linux"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 01:21:42 +0000
On Sunday 02 January 2005 5:53 pm in alt.solaris.x86 Shmuel (Seymour J.)
Metz wrote:
>>Solaris creates its own extended partition containing
>>slices in one of the 4 Primary fdisk Partitions.
>>It can't be installed into a Extended DOS Partition.
>
> That sounds like a good reason to migrate to Linux rather than
> Solaris. Or has SUN announced plans to fix it?
It does actually make sense.
Solaris X86 uses a DOS primary partition as a container for
a standard SunOS disk layout, complete with BSD disk label.
So Solaris sees the expected label and 8 slices, giving full
compatibility for the price of a single indirection.
Chosing the same partition label as Linux swap was a tad
confusing, but there is probably some historic misunderstanding
involved and I am not sure who trod on whose toes in this case.
-- My real address is crn (at) netunix (dot) com WARNING all messages containing attachments or html will be silently deleted. Send only plain text.
- Next message: Tim Hogard: "Re: "Torn between two OS" - Solaris vs Linux"
- Previous message: notbob: "Re: Can anyone print this PDF with acroread?"
- In reply to: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz: "Re: "Torn between two OS" - Solaris vs Linux"
- Next in thread: Joerg Schilling: "Re: "Torn between two OS" - Solaris vs Linux"
- Reply: Joerg Schilling: "Re: "Torn between two OS" - Solaris vs Linux"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|