Re: Fedora Documentation
From: Ivan Marsh (annoyed_at_you.now)
Date: 01/03/05
- Next message: Peter T. Breuer: "Re: Changing DEFAULT terminal type under X"
- Previous message: John Doherty: "Re: "Torn between two OS" - Solaris vs Linux"
- In reply to: A Nengineer: "Re: Fedora Documentation"
- Next in thread: Trish: "Re: Fedora Documentation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 15:41:01 -0600
On Mon, 03 Jan 2005 21:08:54 +0000, A Nengineer wrote:
> Ivan Marsh wrote:
>> On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 18:06:02 +0000, A Nengineer wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Fedora Core is a whole different animal. It is perfect for someone like
>>>me, running one itty-bitty server machine in my SOHO "enterprise."
>>
>>
>> It works quite well for those of us running mission critial servers in a
>> production environment also.
>>
> I don't doubt it. However, the INTENT of Fedora Core is to be "bleeding
> edge," which enterprises that run machines of that description typically
> don't want to do.
That's an exageration of 1 of the 15 objectives of the project.
"Leading Edge" != "Bleeding Edge".
-- We used to have a president that worked with a chimp... I guess it was matter of time before we elected a chimp president. i.m.
- Next message: Peter T. Breuer: "Re: Changing DEFAULT terminal type under X"
- Previous message: John Doherty: "Re: "Torn between two OS" - Solaris vs Linux"
- In reply to: A Nengineer: "Re: Fedora Documentation"
- Next in thread: Trish: "Re: Fedora Documentation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
