{Q} REDHAT AS 3.0 bootable modules different than AS 2.1?
From: aaa (mccdba_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 01/31/05
- Next message: Dances With Crows: "Re: {Q} REDHAT AS 3.0 bootable modules different than AS 2.1?"
- Previous message: Captain Dondo: "Re: FAT32 file system changing case."
- Next in thread: Dances With Crows: "Re: {Q} REDHAT AS 3.0 bootable modules different than AS 2.1?"
- Reply: Dances With Crows: "Re: {Q} REDHAT AS 3.0 bootable modules different than AS 2.1?"
- Reply: Michael Heiming: "Re: {Q} REDHAT AS 3.0 bootable modules different than AS 2.1?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 31 Jan 2005 08:51:38 -0800
We just doing Redhat AS 3.0 update 4 installation. After finished and system
boot up, I check
AS 3.0 is running under "2.4.21-27.ELsmp". I also check /lib/modules there is
ONLY two bootable modules in there. I remember AS 2.1 have
"2.4.9-e.38enterprise " on it. I wonder AS 3.0 does NOT support
"2.4.21-27ELenterprise" any more?
AS 3.0:
# uname -a
Linux mCG-ORA04 2.4.21-27.ELsmp #1 SMP Wed Dec 1 21:59:02 EST 2004 i686 i686
i386 GNU/Linu
# ls -al /lib/modules
total 16
drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 Jan 27 16:40 .
drwxr-xr-x 11 root root 4096 Jan 27 16:54 ..
drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 Jan 27 16:40 2.4.21-27.EL
drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 Jan 27 16:40 2.4.21-27.ELsmp
Thanks.
- Next message: Dances With Crows: "Re: {Q} REDHAT AS 3.0 bootable modules different than AS 2.1?"
- Previous message: Captain Dondo: "Re: FAT32 file system changing case."
- Next in thread: Dances With Crows: "Re: {Q} REDHAT AS 3.0 bootable modules different than AS 2.1?"
- Reply: Dances With Crows: "Re: {Q} REDHAT AS 3.0 bootable modules different than AS 2.1?"
- Reply: Michael Heiming: "Re: {Q} REDHAT AS 3.0 bootable modules different than AS 2.1?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
