Re: [OT] PostgreSQL: bytea help needed.
From: Mike Cox (mikecoxlinux_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 02/03/05
- Next message: mlw: "Re: [OT] PostgreSQL: bytea help needed."
- Previous message: Peter Köhlmann: "Re: [OT] PostgreSQL: bytea help needed."
- In reply to: True211: "Re: [OT] PostgreSQL: bytea help needed."
- Next in thread: True211: "Re: [OT] PostgreSQL: bytea help needed."
- Reply: True211: "Re: [OT] PostgreSQL: bytea help needed."
- Reply: Brian Mailman: "Re: [OT] PostgreSQL: bytea help needed."
- Reply: Rob Kelk: "Re: [OT] PostgreSQL: bytea help needed."
- Reply: Robert McClenon: "Re: [OT] PostgreSQL: bytea help needed."
- Reply: Wayne Brown: "Re: [OT] PostgreSQL: bytea help needed."
- Reply: George William Herbert: "Re: [OT] PostgreSQL: bytea help needed."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 03 Feb 2005 13:34:40 -0800
"True211" <true211@gmail.com> writes:
> >
> > > This isn't really a Linux question, by the way...
> >
> > There are *no* postgresql usenet newsgroups. Not a one. There are
> > mailing lists gated to the pgsql hierarchy, but one needs to subscribe
> > to the mailing list in order to post. Even if one elects not to get
> emails,
> > many people will email you regardless by changing some settings in
> > their mailing client.
> >
> > The NAN moderators are dragging their feet about getting a PostgreSQL
> > CFV through. So people who need help are forced to seek it where
> > there may be a PostgreSQL user, like in the linux group. There is
> > certainly an overlap between Linux users and PostgreSQL users.
>
> Why is this db technical discussion crossposted to news.groups?
>
> Follow-Ups Set
To get the NAN moderators to see the importance of issuing a CFV.
Mind you a PostgreSQL group was proposed in the beginning of November
2004. It is now February 2005, and no CFV yet. The PQ was posted on
Jan. 9th. I did this in response to "This isn't really a Linux
question, by the way...". He needs to realize that the linux group is
the closest thing to a PostgreSQL support group that exists on Usenet
right now.
- Next message: mlw: "Re: [OT] PostgreSQL: bytea help needed."
- Previous message: Peter Köhlmann: "Re: [OT] PostgreSQL: bytea help needed."
- In reply to: True211: "Re: [OT] PostgreSQL: bytea help needed."
- Next in thread: True211: "Re: [OT] PostgreSQL: bytea help needed."
- Reply: True211: "Re: [OT] PostgreSQL: bytea help needed."
- Reply: Brian Mailman: "Re: [OT] PostgreSQL: bytea help needed."
- Reply: Rob Kelk: "Re: [OT] PostgreSQL: bytea help needed."
- Reply: Robert McClenon: "Re: [OT] PostgreSQL: bytea help needed."
- Reply: Wayne Brown: "Re: [OT] PostgreSQL: bytea help needed."
- Reply: George William Herbert: "Re: [OT] PostgreSQL: bytea help needed."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|