Re: [OT] PostgreSQL: bytea help needed.

From: True211 (true211_at_gmail.com)
Date: 02/03/05 

Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2005 16:47:16 -0500

"Mike Cox" <mikecoxlinux@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:m3y8e5s4y7.fsf@linux.local...
> "True211" <true211@gmail.com> writes:
>
>
> > >
> > > > This isn't really a Linux question, by the way...
> > >
> > > There are *no* postgresql usenet newsgroups. Not a one. There are
> > > mailing lists gated to the pgsql hierarchy, but one needs to subscribe
> > > to the mailing list in order to post. Even if one elects not to get
> > emails,
> > > many people will email you regardless by changing some settings in
> > > their mailing client.
> > >
> > > The NAN moderators are dragging their feet about getting a PostgreSQL
> > > CFV through. So people who need help are forced to seek it where
> > > there may be a PostgreSQL user, like in the linux group. There is
> > > certainly an overlap between Linux users and PostgreSQL users.
> >
> > Why is this db technical discussion crossposted to news.groups?
> >
> > Follow-Ups Set
>
> To get the NAN moderators to see the importance of issuing a CFV.
> Mind you a PostgreSQL group was proposed in the beginning of November
> 2004. It is now February 2005, and no CFV yet. The PQ was posted on
> Jan. 9th. I did this in response to "This isn't really a Linux
> question, by the way...". He needs to realize that the linux group is
> the closest thing to a PostgreSQL support group that exists on Usenet
> right now.

There is already a special hierarchy for that program. Search Google for
it.

Follow-Ups set back