Re: off topic: LCD Terminal
From: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (spamtrap_at_library.lspace.org.invalid)
Date: 02/21/05
- Next message: bananananae_at_spamblocked.com: "Re: Fighting email spam and anti-UBE pointers"
- Previous message: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz: "Re: off topic: LCD Terminal"
- In reply to: Michael Black: "Re: off topic: LCD Terminal"
- Next in thread: Jean-David Beyer: "Re: off topic: LCD Terminal"
- Reply: Jean-David Beyer: "Re: off topic: LCD Terminal"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 13:41:00 -0500
In <cv19nm$7b$1@theodyn.ncf.ca>, on 02/17/2005
at 05:23 AM, et472@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Michael Black) said:
>There was a time when long shift registers were used,
The UNIVAC 1 used tanks of Mercury; I'm not sure whether you consider
acoustic delay lines to be shift registers. The most common memory
prior to the advent of core was drums, where you had to worry about
latency if timing was important. Once core became common, most memory
was RAM, be it core, thin film or semiconductor, although there was
some block oriented random access memory (BORAM) on the market.
-- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT <http://patriot.net/~shmuel> Unsolicited bulk E-mail subject to legal action. I reserve the right to publicly post or ridicule any abusive E-mail. Reply to domain Patriot dot net user shmuel+news to contact me. Do not reply to spamtrap@library.lspace.org
- Next message: bananananae_at_spamblocked.com: "Re: Fighting email spam and anti-UBE pointers"
- Previous message: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz: "Re: off topic: LCD Terminal"
- In reply to: Michael Black: "Re: off topic: LCD Terminal"
- Next in thread: Jean-David Beyer: "Re: off topic: LCD Terminal"
- Reply: Jean-David Beyer: "Re: off topic: LCD Terminal"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|