Anybody using a "real" Linux domain?

From: Bill Davis (bdxxxxx_at_hooya.moc)
Date: 05/27/05 

Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 19:25:55 -0400

This is not a request for a cookbook answer of "How do I ...?" I am just
wanting insights from folks who may have done the following.

I assist the full time techie at a fairly small school district, part
time. They have 99% windows desktops, 5 Novell servers and a coupla of
windows 200x servers.

Due to some disguntled vendors, the school board (all of whom are
definitely NON-techie) has been convinced by the local legal staff (all
one of them) that Microsoft is right in their claim that a windows license
is only good for the machine that it was sold for. That is, if you throw
the machine away, you also have to throw the license away.

To me that is total BS. If I buy a refrigerator for my house, then later
move to another, can Sears say that I have to leave the box behind and
purchase another one for my new house because the "license" for that
icebox is only good for the place to which it was originally delivered?
Not as long as Texas allows the ownership of shotguns, it doesn't. I have
pointed out that we have a documented legal license for every PC that
windows is installed on. However, board members don't put legal advice
from a techie over that from a lawyer.

But, there is a good side to the above crap. Since we can either buy
textbooks or new windows licenses, the textbooks won out and we have to
find a cheaper way of doing business. Guess with what?

We have been gradually installing Linux in areas where a single function
can be identifed and removing that function from whatever Winbox it was
on. Such as our Proxy and Surf filter (That saves over nine thousand
dollars a year), firewalls, SANs, programming labs, web server, etc. The
process has been slow enough that we can take our time and make sure that
the new solution works as good or better than the one it replaced.
Desktops have to wait till be handle the servers. But everything that has
gone before can almost be considered to be standalone applications.

Now it is time to plan for the next big leap. Replacing the Novell and MS
server domain that covers the 5 campuses. No small thing, because Novell
does a lot and it does it well and it does it without worms and viruses
and 5 critical patches a week. I have been researching domains using SMB,
LDAP, Kerberos, etc, etc, and obviously Linux will do the same thing - I
am just not sure how well. In our Novell books and docs, domain
management is the bulk of the text. For Linux, domains are mentioned in a
couple of paragraphs at the end of a miscellaneous chapter. The few LDAP
books I have found are too vague to help much and are unsatisfactory.

So, anybody out there driving a one-logon Linux domain, as opposed to just
a bunch of servers? I would like to know your opinions along with what
you are using.

Thanks
Bill Davis

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Linux is as buggy as Windows
    ... > gives his opinion and you attack him too. ... Not just Linux, so don't think I'm ... > and details what I've already suspected and stated countless times before- that Micro$oft is playing BigBrother at its Windows Update Sites. ... databases, spread-sheets, games, webservers, ftp servers, secure-shell ...
    (comp.security.misc)
  • Re: Short List of Security Questions
    ... IIS 6 on Windows Server 2003 is hacked far ... frequently than Apache on Linux. ... automated methods to ease pushing patches, including to critical servers. ... file system which could almost take a bullet. ...
    (microsoft.public.security)
  • Re: OT: LInux stuff again
    ... Not compatible with large systems like Win2003 servers, Novell etc; can't really be used in large networks, doesn't have proper administration of workstations in larger scale (this is what out techies say; the company is running literally thousands of machines and a horde of prorgrams over network and remote access to servers etc...they say even attempting a dozen computers with Linux is a laugh - not meant for serious business use at all. ... I can affirm that I administer lots of Linux servers within the company I work for and they shit all over Windows. ... Despite stable and 'safe' it's easy to screw up the entire system by just doing something like trying to get a soundcard to work (personally e.g. tried to install stuff past Synaptic and pretty soon the whole system crashed personally) ...
    (alt.guitar)
  • Re: Want to give away new app free for Linux
    ... Or if I have a 64 bit version of Linux? ... You still have license issues even if you don't have source. ... a Windows based virtual machine, and then selling it to Windows users ... Here's a sample of how to make money: ...
    (comp.os.linux.misc)
  • Re: Dell sells more Linux servers than Windows at the moment
    ... Indeed, it has been a very rare thing, when I have deployed any heavy server applications on Wintel servers. ... The only difference now is that many former Big Iron from firms like IBM and Sun are now running on x86/x64 boxes that are running Solaris 10 or Linux. ... Windows boxes are used sometimes as file sharing, print servers, Web Servers, or some special Windows operation type boxes. ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)