Mirror/Archive strategy plausible?
martingerxt_at_yahoo.com
Date: 05/28/05
- Previous message: Linønut: "Re: Why Linux is Better than Windows. **My Linux Experience**"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 27 May 2005 16:51:25 -0700
I'm trying to develop an offsite mirror and archive strategy for two
linux boxes I have. I have an offsite machine with 3 disks. One is a
big disk that I use for incremental archives. The other two disks are
mirrors of disks I have in my primary linux machines. I'm using rsync
to do the mirroring and tar to do the incremental archiving.
My question has to do with linux recognizing the the file systems on
the two mirror disks. Since they will have boot and swap areas, will
this confuse the machine's file system? Can I just map them to
something local and ignore the boot particians?
My goal is to be able to take a disk out of my backup machine and plug
it into the primary machine if it fails. I'll of course have to do
database dumps on the primaries and restores on the mirrors to get the
databases properly. Either that or have some sort of replication
system which may be more bandwidth friendly.
I'm also a bit concerned about file ownerships. I guess this is an
rsync isssue, but I'm hoping it will use ownership numbers that will
become relevant only when the mirror drives are booted. Is that what
will happen?
Mirroring/Archiving is a very complex issue, I know. Thanks for any
help.
- Previous message: Linønut: "Re: Why Linux is Better than Windows. **My Linux Experience**"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|