Re: Intel Says: Linux Going NOWHERE ON THE DESKTOP..

From: TravelinMan (Nowhere_at_spamfree.com)
Date: 06/07/05 

Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2005 19:33:37 -0500

In article <zG5pe.43168$Ph4.1027700@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>,
 Nasht0n <nah@nah.ca> wrote:

> TravelinMan wrote:
> > In article <X-GdnWkSb6FNKDnfRVn-hw@comcast.com>,
> > JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>On 2005-06-06, lqualig@uku.co.uk <lqualig@uku.co.uk> wrote:
> >>
> >>>>Well if some marketing troll at Intell said it...
> >>>
> >>>"Elaborating on the significance of the 40-year anniversary of Moore's
> >>>Law, Anand Chandrashekhar, vice president of Intel"
> >>>
> >>>VICE PRESIDENT of INTEL.
> >>>
> >>>Learn to deal with reality and you'll be better off.
> >>
> >> You make it sound like this guy is Cheney.
> >>
> >> The title of VP in a corp doesn't necessarily mean much. It doesn't
> >>give you any clue what he's actually the VP of (like communications). Plus,
> >>in a corp the size of Intel there is probably a whole ring of senior VPs.
> >
> >
> > Even the lowest level VP at Intel is far more accomplished than you are.
>
> How can you live with yourself, you arrogant SOB?

Tell me what's inaccurate about my statement.

>
> > Not to mention being far more capable of speaking to Intel's public
> > policy.
>
> How's the crow, Ragosta?
> I guess when you posted your 'analysis', you were far more capable of
> speaking about Apple's plans than Apple itself?

No, moron.

I was speculating. What part of 'speculating' don't you understand.

When Apple announced their plans, I immediately had to accept them. To
pretend that Jobs didn't know what he was talking about would be silly -
but that's exactly what you're defending here.

>
> What a FREAKING hypocrite, if I ever saw one.

Have a look in a mirror.

And, btw, why did you lie about not posting here for a while?

Relevant Pages