Re: Holy *** Does Linux SUCK!!!
From: Larry Qualig (Lqualig_do_remove_at_uku.co.uk)
Date: 06/23/05
- Next message: amosf: "Re: Linux...Great if you have tons of free time and a tolerance for unstable APPLICATIONS."
- Previous message: Carolyn Marenger: "Re: Motherboard"
- In reply to: Tim Smith: "Re: Holy *** Does Linux SUCK!!!"
- Next in thread: The Ghost In The Machine: "Re: Holy *** Does Linux SUCK!!!"
- Reply: The Ghost In The Machine: "Re: Holy *** Does Linux SUCK!!!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 21:41:35 -0400
"Tim Smith" <reply_in_group@mouse-potato.com> wrote in message
news:Snfue.7835$NX4.7612@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> In article <1119385624.482094.111210@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>, Rommy
> Watson wrote:
>> Opening konqueror and navigating to an mp3 directory of 90,000 mp3's hung
>> the entire system, not just the first time, but EVERY SINGLE TIME I went
>> to that directory. Gee, Windows XP opens it in less than a second.
>
> Windows XP does not handle directories with 90000 files anywhere near that
> fast. You are lying about this, and, it is likely, about everything in
> your
> post.
Let's do the math here. 90,000 mp3 files. Lets be *very* conservative and
say that each file averages 4-megs. So 4-megs X 90,000 files = 360 Gigabytes
of MP3s in a single directory.
Still think he's lying?
- Next message: amosf: "Re: Linux...Great if you have tons of free time and a tolerance for unstable APPLICATIONS."
- Previous message: Carolyn Marenger: "Re: Motherboard"
- In reply to: Tim Smith: "Re: Holy *** Does Linux SUCK!!!"
- Next in thread: The Ghost In The Machine: "Re: Holy *** Does Linux SUCK!!!"
- Reply: The Ghost In The Machine: "Re: Holy *** Does Linux SUCK!!!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]