Re: How do I install this missing library?

From: Peter T. Breuer (ptb_at_oboe.it.uc3m.es)
Date: 09/17/05


Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 19:37:04 +0200

Random Penguin <nonexistent2032@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>> > Yes, I tried Googling for it. The suggested command:
>> > ./configure --enable-languages=c,c++,f77
>>
>> WHAT "suggested command"? Be precise! It sounds like you are taking
>> about instructions in some README or INSTALL in a tar source file?
>> Is that the case? What are you trying to compile? And why?

> http://lists.debian.org/debian-amd64/2005/03/msg00647.html

> These were the instructions I was talking about.

There aren't any instructions there. That's just a mail from somebody
asking how to get a libg2c (it'll come in the package it comes from, of
course). So I repeat my question.

Oh - are you talking not about the link you gave, but the REPLY to it
by danny van dyk?

  libg2c is part of gcc. Actually, it is gcc's internal replacement for
  libf2c, the FORTRAN to C wrapper's library. What you need is a
  FORTRAN enabled gcc package:
    ./configure --enable-languages=c,c++,f77

There you are. He tells you to get one of the gcc pacakges (and nicely
gives you a hint as to what compile options to choose in case you
happen to decide to compile it yourself instead of using one of the
packages prepared for you by your distro - something you don't
sound anywhere near doing!).

Why don't you just install the package he directs you to?

>> libg2c sounds like it's part of a gnu fortran or pascal to c compiler.
>> Feel free to tell us. Is there any reason we should be expected to know
>> without looking it up? If so, why not tell us? What does "linux
>> ling2c.so" in google tell you?

> I am clueless as to what it's for. Hence me Googling for "libg2c.so.0"

I even TOLD you what to google for! Why would you google for anything
else? The answer is there in the first or second link on the answer
page.

>> So what? So set the perms of the ./configure script properly, or make it!
>> Why do you tell us this, instead of listing the file dir entry and its
>> perms?

> Dude, I think you're assuming I know too much about Linux. I don't even
> know what a "configure" script is

Why would you care? You don't know what an electron spin value is, but
you manage to switch on the light every day! You don't care WHAT the
script is, but you have to know if it is THERE or not for you to execute
it, and you have to know what PERMISSIONS it has if it is sitting there
in front of you. So tell us.

>> > My O/S is SuSE 9.2. If I need to download some files,
>>
>> No, you just need to stop behaving like a nitwit. If the file is
>> there, prove it to us, with a listing. If the file is there and you
>> have set its permissions to be executable, prove it to us. If the
>> file is there and the interpreter specified in the first line of the
>> file exists and is executable, prove it to us, with a listing.

> Calm down, I'm the one with stuck here, not you. I've already copied &
> pasted my terminal commands. Please be specific in what further details
> you require. Not quite sure what you're getting at either.

I've stated them, exactly. YOU have to start from the beginning - YOU
have to say what you are doing - YOU can't just say "I ran blahbla"
because "bla bla" is the NAME OF A FILE, and IT SHOULD BE THERE FOR YOU
TO DECIDE TO RUN IT, so it makes no sense to tell us you ran it without
telling us where you got it from, and why you are running it, and what
its permissions are, etc.!

Look - go get a clue. You're acting like you're plain crazy, probably
because you haven't got the faintest idea what anything you are saying
or being told means. To the people who understand the words you are
speaking it sounds like you are speaking and acting like a madman. You
have to fix your comprehension before other people can talk to you in a
common language. Go get the appropriate package from your dvd and
install it. Your package manager will tell you all you need to know.

Peter



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Deploying Software with Computer GPO Errors
    ... Computers to both the share and folder permissions as well as the individual ... computer accounts for the two PC's I am testing. ... the package set to advanced. ... >> Now If I do the samer thing via a User Install it seems to work fine. ...
    (microsoft.public.win2000.active_directory)
  • Re: failed to install java-1.5.0-sun-compat-1.5.0.06-1jpp.i586.rpm
    ... Read the "Build Instructions" at jpackage.org. ... besides reading the instructions is to install the fedora-rpmdevltools ... package from Extras and download the .bin file from Sun. ... I wrote a quick and painless guide to install JPackage's ...
    (Fedora)
  • Re: Deploying Software with Computer GPO Errors
    ... computer use it's own account to access the package on the network share. ... > Group Policies in the Computer Policy. ... set the permissions on the share with Administrators having full ... > policy Office 2003 Admin Install failed. ...
    (microsoft.public.win2000.active_directory)
  • Re: Installing HP print package
    ... Please configure the sub-packages you would like to install. ... package distributed by HP or Brand X code that's supposed to support HP ... Did you follow those instructions? ... FWIW if it works on Solaris 9, it should also work on Solaris 10. ...
    (comp.unix.solaris)
  • Re: software package disappeared in GPO after access rights change
    ... the same permissions. ... Refer to http://support.microsoft.com/kb/216359 for instructions how to ... The intention was to disable installation of that package for now, ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.active_directory)