Re: Article: Are You Ready for Linux?
From: Netocrat (netocrat_at_dodo.com.au)
Date: 10/06/05
- Next message: Michael Heiming: "Re: Article: Are You Ready for Linux?"
- Previous message: Jean-David Beyer: "Re: Differece between printf and printk"
- In reply to: Peter T. Breuer: "Re: Article: Are You Ready for Linux?"
- Next in thread: Michael Heiming: "Re: Article: Are You Ready for Linux?"
- Reply: Michael Heiming: "Re: Article: Are You Ready for Linux?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2005 15:46:34 GMT
On Thu, 06 Oct 2005 16:28:18 +0200, Peter T. Breuer wrote:
> Netocrat <netocrat@dodo.com.au> wrote:
>> But this is slightly different - the distinction is not in the number or
>> type of steps the environment takes after accepting one's instructions,
>> it's that some extra instructions will be necessary in one case and not
>> the other.
>
> No they won't be.. You don't seem to get it - in BOTH cases ONE
> instruction will be necessary.
Good call - my logic was out with that statement especially in
relation to the compiled vs interpreted comments.
My original reply assumed (and on consideration you probably didn't intend
to imply that assumption) that the person entering the instruction was
also responsible for implementing it but in any case the point I was
making does not seem to be directly relevant to your (consistent and
correct) comment that ultimately only one instruction is required.
-- http://members.dodo.com.au/~netocrat
- Next message: Michael Heiming: "Re: Article: Are You Ready for Linux?"
- Previous message: Jean-David Beyer: "Re: Differece between printf and printk"
- In reply to: Peter T. Breuer: "Re: Article: Are You Ready for Linux?"
- Next in thread: Michael Heiming: "Re: Article: Are You Ready for Linux?"
- Reply: Michael Heiming: "Re: Article: Are You Ready for Linux?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|