Re: Rescuing a tape archive, understanding dd
From: Maury Markowitz (maury_markowitz_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 11/07/05
- Next message: alex.gman_at_gmail.com: "Re: wine useless, open source fails it"
- Previous message: Maury Markowitz: "Re: Rescuing a tape archive, understanding dd"
- In reply to: Jean-David Beyer: "Re: Rescuing a tape archive, understanding dd"
- Next in thread: Jean-David Beyer: "Re: Rescuing a tape archive, understanding dd"
- Reply: Jean-David Beyer: "Re: Rescuing a tape archive, understanding dd"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 7 Nov 2005 10:15:23 -0800
> I use BRU, and I can specify any block size I want. The manual
> says it uses 20KBytes by default, and perhaps it does. I use
> "64K". My tape drive (Exabyte VXA-2) has a 2MByte internal buffer.
What happens if I specify a block size that is larger than what was
used to write the tape? Zero-filled perhaps?
I guess my question is this: is there any way to determine the block
size, given the tape?
Maury
- Next message: alex.gman_at_gmail.com: "Re: wine useless, open source fails it"
- Previous message: Maury Markowitz: "Re: Rescuing a tape archive, understanding dd"
- In reply to: Jean-David Beyer: "Re: Rescuing a tape archive, understanding dd"
- Next in thread: Jean-David Beyer: "Re: Rescuing a tape archive, understanding dd"
- Reply: Jean-David Beyer: "Re: Rescuing a tape archive, understanding dd"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|