Re: command line vs gui
From: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (spamtrap_at_library.lspace.org.invalid)
Date: 11/27/05
- Next message: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz: "Re: command line vs gui"
- Previous message: Dan Espen: "Re: Which Distro? (Comparative.)"
- In reply to: blmblm_at_myrealbox.com: "Re: command line vs gui"
- Next in thread: blmblm_at_myrealbox.com: "Re: command line vs gui"
- Reply: blmblm_at_myrealbox.com: "Re: command line vs gui"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2005 09:20:16 -0500
In <3un2i1F12cdr5U1@individual.net>, on 11/25/2005
at 12:01 AM, blmblm@myrealbox.com said:
>Nice to hear another opinion on this. You're right that duplicating
>information is not helpful except in conforming to a supposed
>syntactic standard
It's a real standard. Or at least a real RFC.
>which only AC seems to be adamant about
No. Many people are adamant about the standard, although indifferent
to what AC wants. According to the standard the name and the comment
are both *optional*.
>And in the process of removing the duplicate information in headers,
It would be more helpful for to use
From: "B. L. Massingill" <blmblm@myrealbox.com>
but, as I noted, what you are currently using is syntactically valid.
-- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT <http://patriot.net/~shmuel> Unsolicited bulk E-mail subject to legal action. I reserve the right to publicly post or ridicule any abusive E-mail. Reply to domain Patriot dot net user shmuel+news to contact me. Do not reply to spamtrap@library.lspace.org
- Next message: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz: "Re: command line vs gui"
- Previous message: Dan Espen: "Re: Which Distro? (Comparative.)"
- In reply to: blmblm_at_myrealbox.com: "Re: command line vs gui"
- Next in thread: blmblm_at_myrealbox.com: "Re: command line vs gui"
- Reply: blmblm_at_myrealbox.com: "Re: command line vs gui"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|