Linux Vs. FreeBSD
- From: "Daveman750" <dsimcha@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 7 Dec 2005 20:38:27 -0800
I have noticed that Linux seems to be more popular than FreeBSD as an
emerging desktop OS, while FreeBSD seems to be very popular as a server
OS. Having used Linux but not FreeBSD, this seems to be the opposite
of what is logical. Linux is very fragmented and modular, which can be
a plus on a server that you set up once and leave, since it allows for
more choice. However, this fragmentation is a disadvantage on a
desktop, where a major goal is wide compatibility. Why has FreeBSD or
some other BSD variant (my understanding is that FreeBSD is currently
the most user-friendly) started to emerge as a desktop OS? It seems
that FreeBSD's more "unified" nature offers a huge advantage. Also,
Apple has had success using BSD-derived Darwin, which indicates that
BSD is basically a viable desktop OS.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Linux Vs. FreeBSD
- From: Centurion
- Re: Linux Vs. FreeBSD
- From: Mark South
- Re: Linux Vs. FreeBSD
- From: grenoble
- Re: Linux Vs. FreeBSD
- From: Ed Heagle
- Re: Linux Vs. FreeBSD
- Prev by Date: Re: File Fragmentation
- Next by Date: Re: How to selectivey route messages?
- Previous by thread: AMD CPU Mobile functions
- Next by thread: Re: Linux Vs. FreeBSD
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|