Re: Linux Vs. FreeBSD



> This is an RPM problem, not a binary problem, and it is a well-known and
> much-ridiculed one. If you were to use, say ,rpm2tgz (or whatever it's
> called), and turn those packages into a tarball and extract them, if you
> met the required dependencies (actually met them, not met whatever your
> distro chooses to call them), you can run that program. Most programs
> worth using usually make a few binary forms available, and a plain tarball
> is usually one of them. Don't go blaming Red Hat's idiocy, and the idiocy
> of those who follow them, on a binary incompatability problem that by and
> large does not exist.

So basically what you're trying to say is that this problem would be
effectively solved if Linux had a better de facto standard package
manager? In other words, with a better de facto standard package
manager, one package would work on virtually any Linux distro for a
given CPU type? Wow. This distro-specific package management has so
far been my number one frustration with Linux, since unless you're
using a very well-known, popular distro, you can't always find
everything you would want packaged for your specific distro, and using
tar.gz package management=dependency hell.

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: why debian - longer
    ... whatever versions that corresponds to each other's distro ... admins are users too though a different bunch of users ... ... > what's on the filesystem to what is in the debian package. ...
    (Debian-User)
  • Re: Is there a need for another distribution?
    ... So to get up to date Tcl packages into your distribution of choice (be ... A new core binary distribution wouldn't fix much in this area. ... There is no real need for another binary distro, ... ..You may not distribute copies of this Package, ...
    (comp.lang.tcl)
  • Re: MV on Ubuntu
    ... I tend to lean towards Debian for a stable Linux O/S. ... admin to install and remove software bundles without breaking the ... Thing is, if you create a package for any distro, you SHOULD be able ...
    (comp.databases.pick)
  • Re: [SLE] Suggestion to improve OpenSUSE by providing only selected package!
    ... (kde), fox, etc. ... whichever distro comes ... Why not just include it all in a single installation ... right, i never say to not include other package, but i ...
    (SuSE)
  • Re: gnome 2.4 installs????
    ... > sort of distribution package that I could ... The developers site is for developers, ... > compile anything nor should I have to go ... Packaging for a distro is precisely what a distro ...
    (linux.redhat.misc)