Re: fastest way to print a lot of pdf files?
- From: "Peter T. Breuer" <ptb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 12:35:05 +0100
Mark South <mark.south@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, 09 Dec 2005 19:23:06 +0000, Unruh wrote:
>> Mark South <mark.south@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>>On Fri, 09 Dec 2005 12:29:33 +0100, Peter T. Breuer wrote:
>>>> Mark South <mark.south@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>> Only if you can show that $$\Omega_{cosmic} \le 1$$.
>>>> Oh, I see. Current opinion is that it = 1, isn't it?
>>
>>>There is a common fallacy that it should be close to 1 for purely
>>>theoretical reasons - the logic used is that if it were exactly 1 then
>>>some theorists could sit back and relax and not have to think anymore.
>>
>> The measured value from WMAP is 1.
> It's difficult to accept with conviction high precision results that
> coincidentally agree with the value everyone expected to implausibly high
> precision.
This is an economic or ergonomic theory of the universe? It seems
anti-anthropomrphic - i.e. if it were 1 then theorists wouldn't be
needed.
>> universe will expand "forever" even if Omega>1.
>>
>> DeSitter space, an exact solution to Einstein's equations expands forever,
>> even though Omega >1
> I thought I already said something about vacuum energy screwing it up, but
> if not, yeah.
>> There are still numerous arguments that the energy is bounded and that the
>> number of states are also bounded.
> I know, I published some of them (do you remember me asking ages ago if
> you were the quantum gravity Bill Unruh? If so, we have friends in
> common). There are almost as many arguments the other way too :-)
I recall the bounded states argument, but not very well. Something
about the quantum size limits as related to the very early universe and
the information equivalence between the event horizon of a singularity
and what has gone into it. The result was something like - # internal
states are proportional to the surface area of the singularity horizon.
We can see out to a radius of 13.7 billion light years, so calculate how
many internal states there are in our sphere of influence.
As to energy, it seems strange to me that energy content could grow as
the universe expands, but I grant you that there appears to be some kind
of negative energy pressure pushing it apart, so having less of that
would be more energy for us :-).
Please don't boggle my mind about what this means for conservation of
energy - what meaning does that law have if negative energy exists?
And where did that initial energy come from? Somebody is going to tell
me that it sums with the negative energy to be zero, so we could
calculate the repulsive force exerted by negative energy from
observations of positive energy (and mass) and the observed expansion.
And then what about those weird p-brane arguments about the universe
being a collision between branes, and the weakness of gravity being due
to gravity having gone off in the other brane ...
>> All of which is completely irrelevant since the OP was talking about
>> printing out an amount of pdf files on his own computer, whose energy and
>> number of states and disk space certainly is bounded, and whose lifetime (
>> computer and person) is also bounded.
> Hey, it was Peter who spun the ball off earth and into Earth's forward
> light cone. Take it up with him. Et bien, pour moi, c'est le weekend.
We don't need to go so far. Just let the OP import an nfs export from
somebody else (who has imported an nfs export from somebody else ...).
Peter
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: fastest way to print a lot of pdf files?
- From: Mark South
- Re: fastest way to print a lot of pdf files?
- References:
- fastest way to print a lot of pdf files?
- From: JSorel
- Re: fastest way to print a lot of pdf files?
- From: Mark South
- Re: fastest way to print a lot of pdf files?
- From: Peter T. Breuer
- Re: fastest way to print a lot of pdf files?
- From: Unruh
- Re: fastest way to print a lot of pdf files?
- From: Peter T. Breuer
- Re: fastest way to print a lot of pdf files?
- From: Unruh
- Re: fastest way to print a lot of pdf files?
- From: Peter T. Breuer
- Re: fastest way to print a lot of pdf files?
- From: Mark South
- Re: fastest way to print a lot of pdf files?
- From: Peter T. Breuer
- Re: fastest way to print a lot of pdf files?
- From: Mark South
- Re: fastest way to print a lot of pdf files?
- From: Unruh
- Re: fastest way to print a lot of pdf files?
- From: Mark South
- fastest way to print a lot of pdf files?
- Prev by Date: Re: Newbie Qns: How do I...
- Next by Date: Re: fastest way to print a lot of pdf files?
- Previous by thread: Re: fastest way to print a lot of pdf files?
- Next by thread: Re: fastest way to print a lot of pdf files?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|