Re: fight baldness

On Wed, 04 Jan 2006 15:29:06 -0800, roberts.noah wrote:

>> True enough, regarding the supported hardware. I have very little
>> sympathy for those that choose to buy unsupported hardware, however, since
>> research on what works is trivially easy these days. Their frustration is
>> their own doing.

> Tell you what. When you have a list of supported cards and you buy one
> only to take it home and find it isn't supported I'm going to laugh my
> ass off at you.

That's not going to happen. I figure things out *before* I buy the
hardware. Were you referring to the other thread where you admitted to
not realizing it was a "V2" that wasn't supported? What supported card
have you brought home and found it to be not working? Huh?

> For now I'll just let you imagine what you can do with your "sympathy".

I don't have any sympathy.

--
If you're not on the edge, you're taking up too much space.
Linux Registered User #327951

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: direct I/O access
    ... You have my sympathy. ... when i try something like this i receive a sigbus error ... The hardware has changed a lot since the days of ... Do you know modern hardware, or are you still using dos-era ...
    (freebsd-hackers)
  • RE: Bf24 Install (2.4.20 Kernel?)
    ... > The documentation included in the kernel source can maybe ... > if instead of trying to find out what hardware the kernel ... Supported Cards: ... So unfortunately no support, but I had 2.4.24 source, and looks like it ...
    (Debian-User)