Re: Multiple Installs = Multiple Swap Partitions?
- From: Jim Strathmeyer <strathWHATEVERIGETENOUGHSPAMANYWAYS@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 12:47:34 -0600
John Hasler <john@xxxxxxxxxx> schrieb:
> PeteCresswell writes:
>> So, if I wanted to try to be cute about it, I could carve out a FAT32
>> partition, give it a drive letter for Windows' sake, and point
>> everybody to it - thereby establishing a common place to store all my
>> documents. (?)
> That would be a good way of sharing documents between Microsoft
> Windows and Linux, but it would not be a good idea to use it for
> anything but that under Linux. Don't make it your Linux /home. FAT
> does not have any notion of file permissions or ownership. I don't
> think it supports symlinks, either.
There are certainly MS Windows programs that can access ext3 partitions,
so you could use the same /home partition for every Linux installation
and also access it from MS Windows.
--
Jim Strathmeyer
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Multiple Installs = Multiple Swap Partitions?
- From: Robert Hull
- Re: Multiple Installs = Multiple Swap Partitions?
- References:
- Multiple Installs = Multiple Swap Partitions?
- From: (PeteCresswell)
- Re: Multiple Installs = Multiple Swap Partitions?
- From: John Hasler
- Re: Multiple Installs = Multiple Swap Partitions?
- From: (PeteCresswell)
- Re: Multiple Installs = Multiple Swap Partitions?
- From: John Hasler
- Multiple Installs = Multiple Swap Partitions?
- Prev by Date: OCR and linux; text and equations
- Next by Date: Re: Multiple Installs = Multiple Swap Partitions?
- Previous by thread: Re: Multiple Installs = Multiple Swap Partitions?
- Next by thread: Re: Multiple Installs = Multiple Swap Partitions?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|