Re: Inventory - Warehouse software.
- From: "Chris F.A. Johnson" <cfajohnson@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 19:26:28 -0400
On 2006-04-23, Rui Maciel wrote:
The question, althought it wasn't well crafted, was indeed valid.
What question? When posting to Usenet news please provide context.
If you don't agree then you could simply asked Albert to explain
himself better, which you didn't. You opted to flame him with a
variation of the old RTFM line instead of being helpfull and then
the thread went downhill from there.
RTFM is not a flame; it is being helpful.
Seriously, what's the point of flaming someone just because the
question wasn't well formulated?
Listen, you snot-nosed little twerp, you haven't the foggiest
notion what the f*** you are talking about, So STFU!
:) That is flaming, though if it were for real the asterisks would
be replaced with the appropriate letters.
Wouldn't it be better if you suggested him to work on the question?
What do you think RTFM is? It is telling the OP that help is
available in the fine manual, or on Google, or wherever.
After all, if you don't intend to help, why answer in the first
Chris F.A. Johnson, author | <http://cfaj.freeshell.org>
Shell Scripting Recipes: | My code in this post, if any,
A Problem-Solution Approach | is released under the
2005, Apress | GNU General Public Licence
- Prev by Date: Re: How to fend off ng spam effectively...
- Next by Date: Re: Inventory - Warehouse software.
- Previous by thread: Re: Inventory - Warehouse software.
- Next by thread: Re: Inventory - Warehouse software.