Re: Flash Player
- From: Keith Keller <kkeller-usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 23:09:54 -0700
On 2006-04-24, wxgeek@xxxxxxxxx <wxgeek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Anybody know if a Flash Player is ever
going to be available for the X86_64 (64 bit processors)?
I have not tested this, but one possible way to get the plugin to work
would be to get a firefox/mozilla that's been compiled 32bit, then
install the 32bit flash plugin. I know it's a bit of a pain to switch
back and forth between a 64bit and 32bit browser, but you probably
wouldn't notice much difference and so could just use the 32bit browser
all the time, if you wanted.
If you really want an x86_64 flash player, ask Macromedia/Adobe.
A lot of web pages depend on flash player to function.
A lot of web pages depend on flash that don't really need the features
that flash provides. Those webmasters should be beaten with a clue
stick. ;-/
--keith
--
kkeller-usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
(try just my userid to email me)
AOLSFAQ=http://wombat.san-francisco.ca.us/cgi-bin/fom
see X- headers for PGP signature information
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Flash Player
- From: Robert M. Riches Jr.
- Re: Flash Player
- References:
- Flash Player
- From: wxgeek@xxxxxxxxx
- Flash Player
- Prev by Date: terminalbased financial accounting software
- Next by Date: Re: cannot access file, permission denied as root
- Previous by thread: Flash Player
- Next by thread: Re: Flash Player
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
