Re: redbook vs. whitepaper
- From: Mark South <mark.south@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 21:47:49 +0200
On Mon, 24 Apr 2006 11:01:21 -0400, Lew Pitcher wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
zansheva@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Can anyone tell me the difference between an IBM redbook and their
whitepapers? Redbooks are for
Redbooks are the "how to" guides. They are practical examples.
and whitepapers are for
White Papers are the theory and analysis. They are direction papers
how do these two documents differ?
Theory (Whitepaper) and Practice (Redbook)
The colours are carefully chosen. They contrast the abstract purity of
theory with the bloody reality of practice.
--
mark south; echo znexfbhgu2000@xxxxxxxxxxx|tr a-z n-za-m
"I can trace my ancestry back to a protoplasmal primordial atomic
globule. Consequently, my family pride is something inconceivable."
-- Gilbert & Sullivan, The Mikado
.
- References:
- redbook vs. whitepaper
- From: zansheva
- Re: redbook vs. whitepaper
- From: Lew Pitcher
- redbook vs. whitepaper
- Prev by Date: Re: Trouble copying files to SanDisk m230
- Next by Date: Re: grep Q: how to pick only a few lines...
- Previous by thread: Re: redbook vs. whitepaper
- Next by thread: Re: redbook vs. whitepaper
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
