Re: Is LINUX for losers?

On 2006-04-28, ray <ray@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, 28 Apr 2006 13:42:58 +0000, Cuz wrote:

http://www.forbes.com/intelligentinfrastructure/2005/06/16/linux-bsd-unix-cz_dl_0616theo.html

I scanned the article. It smacks of 'sour grapes' to me. Looky here, my OS
is vastly superior in design and execution but they're getting all the use
and press. Boo hoo hoo.

Yeah, but can't you s/linux/windows/g and s/Theo de Raadt/linux zealots/g
and still have a pretty accurate article? So maybe OpenBSD users are
laughing at me the same way I laugh at Windows users. :)

I'm not saying de Raadt is correct, just that we should be careful how
we throw stones.

I did like Linus' very short quote: de Raadt is ''difficult''. :)

--keith

--
kkeller-usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
(try just my userid to email me)
AOLSFAQ=http://wombat.san-francisco.ca.us/cgi-bin/fom
see X- headers for PGP signature information

.