Re: question about piping and standard output
- From: "Chirag Shukla" <chiragshuklaindia@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 31 May 2006 10:46:57 -0700
Vilmos Soti wrote:
"Chirag Shukla" <chiragshuklaindia@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
dump -0 -a -u -f - /dev/sda1 | split -b2000m - foo.dump && tar cvzf
foo.tar.gz && rm foo.dump*
Typed too fast and missed a thing, sorry. Here the correction:
...
dump -0 -a -u -f - /dev/sda1 | split -b2000m - foo.dump && tar cvzf
foo.tar.gz foo.dump* > /dev/null && rm foo.dump*
What's the point of asking tar to be verbose then to redirect
it to /dev/null? Wouldn't it be easier just to use "tar czf ..."
and forget the redirection? :-))
Yes, thats right :p Funny.
.
- References:
- question about piping and standard output
- From: Ben
- Re: question about piping and standard output
- From: Chirag Shukla
- Re: question about piping and standard output
- From: Chirag Shukla
- Re: question about piping and standard output
- From: Vilmos Soti
- question about piping and standard output
- Prev by Date: Re: VM/Windows backdoor?
- Next by Date: Re: A transparent content filter
- Previous by thread: Re: question about piping and standard output
- Next by thread: Re: question about piping and standard output
- Index(es):